Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 12, 2024 2:59:57 GMT -5
Mischaracterize an employment relationship is fraud. The artifice must be considered illegal and both the company and the cooperative are responsible for the corresponding labor obligations. The understanding comes from judge Grijalbo Fernandes Coutinho, from the 19th Labor Court in BrasÃlia. Mariana Cardoso de Jesus claimed that she was hired as a collector by the Credit and Collection Professionals Cooperative to work at the collection company Operator Serviços. She stated that there was fraud in the employment contract because she was never a member of the cooperative but was employed by the cooperative itself. Therefore, she wants to receive the due rights of the employment relationship.
Such as advance notice salary differences, full and proportional vacations, 13th salary, FGTS, overtime, family salary and unemployment insurance. The employee also requested that her status as a member of the Dubai Email List cooperative be annulled, under the terms of article 9 of the CLT, because she never performed this role, since, according to the false member, it would be a false cooperative that acts as a false company providing labor. -constructions. The cooperative claimed that the employee had no employment relationship, as she was a member of the cooperative. The collection company assured that it maintained.
Direct relationship with the employee only from January 2004 onwards. In the previous period, services were provided through the cooperative, which rules out the possibility of recognizing the employment relationship. The employee worked for the cooperative between January 2002 and December 2003. From 2004 to 2005 she had an employment contract signed with the real employer, the collection company. No conviction should cover the period in which it was correctly contracted by the collection company, in the judge's opinion. But he understood that both companies must respond for the period in which the worker was providing services to the cooperative and for the damages caused to the employee.
Such as advance notice salary differences, full and proportional vacations, 13th salary, FGTS, overtime, family salary and unemployment insurance. The employee also requested that her status as a member of the Dubai Email List cooperative be annulled, under the terms of article 9 of the CLT, because she never performed this role, since, according to the false member, it would be a false cooperative that acts as a false company providing labor. -constructions. The cooperative claimed that the employee had no employment relationship, as she was a member of the cooperative. The collection company assured that it maintained.
Direct relationship with the employee only from January 2004 onwards. In the previous period, services were provided through the cooperative, which rules out the possibility of recognizing the employment relationship. The employee worked for the cooperative between January 2002 and December 2003. From 2004 to 2005 she had an employment contract signed with the real employer, the collection company. No conviction should cover the period in which it was correctly contracted by the collection company, in the judge's opinion. But he understood that both companies must respond for the period in which the worker was providing services to the cooperative and for the damages caused to the employee.